<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Ninebark & Co.]]></title><description><![CDATA[Ninebark & Co.]]></description><link>https://www.ninebarkandco.com/blog</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 08:19:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.ninebarkandco.com/blog-feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[Most HR Dashboards Report Activity. Leaders Need Business Signals.]]></title><description><![CDATA[The best workforce reporting does not prove that HR is busy. It helps leaders decide where to act. HR dashboards often contain a great deal of information and very little guidance. They report headcount, turnover, time to fill, training completions, engagement scores, and open requisitions. Those measures are not useless. The problem is that they are frequently presented without the business context required to make a decision. A CEO does not need a longer list of HR activity. A CEO needs to...]]></description><link>https://www.ninebarkandco.com/post/most-hr-dashboards-report-activity-leaders-need-business-signals</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6a6f8b523e0c16484ff969e3</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 18:29:18 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jeramy Johnson</dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[When Does a Growing Company Actually Need a Head of People?]]></title><description><![CDATA[Employee count is a useful signal, but organizational complexity is the better test. Growing companies often ask the same question: At what employee count do we need a Head of People? There is no reliable number. A 60-person company operating in one location with experienced managers may need less senior HR support than a 35-person company hiring across several states, building a leadership team, and preparing for its next round of growth. Headcount matters because it creates volume....]]></description><link>https://www.ninebarkandco.com/post/when-does-a-growing-company-actually-need-a-head-of-people</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6a6f8a38bca6fdcb434db05f</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 18:23:48 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jeramy Johnson</dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[The 400-Hire Problem: Why Large-Scale Recruiting Starts With Operations]]></title><description><![CDATA[A hiring target is not a talent acquisition strategy. It is a business-capacity decision with recruiting consequences. In one of my prior operating roles, the business set out to hire 400 field-service technicians in a year. The previous high was 156. It would be easy to tell that story as a recruiting campaign. The sourcing work mattered. The employer message mattered. Recruiter capacity mattered. But none of those were the real starting point. The starting point was the operation. The...]]></description><link>https://www.ninebarkandco.com/post/the-400-hire-problem-why-large-scale-recruiting-starts-with-operations</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6a6f894916cff318c185873f</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 18:18:40 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jeramy Johnson</dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Your People Strategy Should Follow Your Product Lifecycle]]></title><description><![CDATA[Companies often outgrow their talent practices before they recognize that the business itself has moved into a new stage. Most companies accept that products move through stages. A new offer is tested, built, scaled, improved, and eventually replaced or renewed. The organization supporting that product moves through stages too, but the people system often changes much more slowly. That lag creates problems. A company can be trying to scale while its roles still depend on a handful of early...]]></description><link>https://www.ninebarkandco.com/post/your-people-strategy-should-follow-your-product-lifecycle</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6a6f882ebca6fdcb434daade</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 18:14:34 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jeramy Johnson</dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[HR Should Not Start With People. It Should Start With the Business.]]></title><description><![CDATA[A people strategy is only useful when it is built around the customer, the product, the operating model, and the financial plan. I have spent most of my career in HR, and I understand why the phrase “people first” is so appealing. It sounds humane. It signals that employees matter. It also gives HR a clear place in the conversation. But I do not believe strong HR work starts with people. It starts with the business. That is not an argument for treating employees as secondary. It is an...]]></description><link>https://www.ninebarkandco.com/post/hr-should-not-start-with-people-it-should-start-with-the-business</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6a6f84f53e0c16484ff958a0</guid><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 18:02:00 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Jeramy Johnson</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>